THE OFFICER GRABBED HIS SUIT — THEN THE MAN SAID, “YOU’VE MADE A HUGE MISTAKE”

Chapter 4

Theme:
Font Size:
24px

“Then tell me why you grabbed his jacket.”

Mitchell's face darkened.

“He started questioning me.”

“That is not a justification.”

“He was being difficult.”

“People are allowed to ask why an officer is demanding their property.”

“I thought he might be trying to stall.”

“Based on what?”

Mitchell stared at the notebook.

“Based on the alert.”

Brooks wrote one final line.

“Which we have not verified.”

A silence settled between them.

Then Daniel spoke.

“There is another question you should ask him.”

Brooks looked up.

“What question?”

“Whether the alert appeared only on his terminal.”

Mitchell raised his head.

“What?”

“Did any other officer receive the same instruction?”

“I don't know.”

“Did you see a general broadcast?”

“No.”

“Was there a dispatch announcement?”

“Not that I heard.”

Daniel turned to Brooks.

“If the message was sent through an authorized system, there should be a record of its origin and distribution. If it was sent only to one officer, that matters.”

Brooks studied him.

“You believe someone selected Officer Mitchell specifically?”

“I believe we should find out.”

Mitchell looked offended.

“Are you saying someone used me?”

Daniel's answer came without hesitation.

“I'm saying someone may have used your authority to get to me.”

Mitchell glanced at the bag.

For the first time, he seemed to understand that the object he had tried to seize might not be the most dangerous thing in the terminal.

The notification itself might be.

CHAPTER 3 — A NAME THAT DISAPPEARED

Brooks escorted Daniel to a nearby administrative room where they could speak without the noise of the departure gates.

She did not seize his bag. She did not tell him he was under arrest. She explained that she wanted to document the incident and verify the source of the suspicious notification.

Daniel agreed to accompany her.

Mitchell followed at a distance, carrying his device.

The administrative room was small and functional. A desk stood against one wall. Two chairs faced each other beneath a fluorescent light. A security monitor displayed a corridor outside the room.

Brooks closed the door but left it unlocked.

“Before we continue,” she said, “I want to be clear about something. I cannot promise that this incident will remain local if the notification turns out to be connected to a federal investigation.”

“I wouldn't expect you to.”

“I also cannot promise that the people who sent it will cooperate.”

Daniel placed his bag beside his chair.

“That is what concerns me.”

Brooks sat down.

“Tell me what you can tell me without compromising anything you are not authorized to disclose.”

Daniel considered his answer carefully.

“My current assignment involves reviewing irregularities in a series of government procurement records.”

“What kind of irregularities?”

“Contracts that were approved, amended, or closed under circumstances that do not match the underlying documentation.”

“Fraud?”

“Possibly. I won't characterize it beyond that.”

“Does the bag contain evidence?”

“It contains documents related to my work. Some are ordinary records. Some are sensitive.”

“Are any of them classified?”

Daniel met her eyes.

“I cannot discuss the contents in detail. But I can tell you that the bag should not be opened by an unauthorized person.”

Brooks nodded.

“That is not the same as saying it contains classified material.”

“No. It isn't.”

He seemed to appreciate that she understood the distinction.

“Did you expect someone to interfere with your travel?” she asked.

“I expected that someone might try to discover what I had found. I did not expect an airport police officer to receive a fabricated or unverifiable instruction with my location attached.”

“Have you reported any threats?”

“Not directly.”

“Why not?”

“Because I have not received a direct threat.”

Brooks leaned back.

“That is a narrow distinction.”

“It is an important one. Suspicion is not evidence. If I report every unexplained coincidence as a threat, the people reviewing my work will eventually stop distinguishing between a genuine warning and an ordinary irregularity.”

“And now?”

“Now I have evidence of an attempted interference with my movement and property.”

Brooks wrote that down.

“Who knows you are carrying these documents?”

“A limited number of people.”

“Names?”

Daniel hesitated.

“I can provide the names through the appropriate channel. I would prefer not to put them into a local incident report until we establish who has access to it.”

Brooks studied him for a moment.

“You are worried about information leaking from this department.”

“I am worried about information leaking from any system that has not demonstrated it can protect the information it receives.”

“That includes my department.”

“It includes everyone.”

Brooks accepted the answer without taking offense.

She had worked with enough investigators to know that distrust was not always arrogance. Sometimes it was the consequence of having watched the same safeguards fail repeatedly.

She turned toward Mitchell, who was standing near the door.

“Officer, show me the full notification history.”

Mitchell unlocked his device.

Brooks examined the screen.

The alert had appeared at 10:17 a.m. The sender field displayed a shortened designation: INTEL-OPS.

Below it was a line marked Priority: Immediate.

There was no individual sender name.

No supervisor authorization.

No accompanying incident summary.

Brooks scrolled down.

The notification had been delivered directly to Mitchell's terminal. It had not appeared in the general dispatch log available through the ordinary interface.

She frowned.

“Did you receive a voice confirmation?”

“No.”

“A phone call?”

“No.”

“Any follow-up message?”

“Not until you arrived.”

“What follow-up message?”

Mitchell opened a second screen.

At 10:29 a.m., a new message had appeared.

CONFIRM SUBJECT SECURED. REPORT STATUS IMMEDIATELY.

Brooks stared at the words.

The time was only minutes after she had arrived and taken control of the encounter.

Someone was monitoring the situation.

Someone wanted to know whether Daniel had been stopped.

And that someone had direct access to a channel that Mitchell believed was official.

Brooks copied the message details into her notebook.

“Do not respond to this sender,” she said.

Mitchell looked uneasy.

“What if it's a legitimate supervisor?”

“Then a legitimate supervisor can identify themselves through a verified channel.”

She turned back to Daniel.

“Has anyone contacted you since the notification appeared?”

“No.”

“Have you received any unusual calls today?”

“One.”

“When?”

“About twenty minutes before I entered the terminal.”

“Who called?”

“An unidentified number.”

“What did the caller say?”

Daniel looked down at his hands.

“The person asked whether I had the original.”

Brooks waited.

“I asked who was calling. The person ended the call.”

“What original?”

Daniel lifted his eyes.

“The document that explains why several records were changed.”

Brooks felt the pieces begin to connect.

“Do you believe the caller was connected to the alert?”

“I believe the timing is suspicious.”

“Can you identify the caller?”

“No.”

“Can your phone records help?”

“They may help establish when the call came in. They may not establish who made it.”

Brooks nodded.

“Then we preserve what we have and avoid assuming what it means.”

Daniel gave her a faint, approving look.

“That's a good place to start.”

For several seconds, neither spoke.

Then Mitchell's device vibrated.

He looked at it and went pale.

Brooks noticed immediately.

“What is it?”

Mitchell turned the screen toward her.

A third message had appeared.

This one contained only six words.

THE MAN MUST NOT LEAVE THE AIRPORT.

No name.

No case number.

No explanation.

Brooks read it once, then handed the device back.

“Now we have a problem.”

Daniel's face had become completely expressionless.

“No,” he said.

Brooks looked at him.

“No?”

He picked up his travel bag.

“We have confirmation.”

“Confirmation of what?”

Daniel looked toward the closed door.

“That whoever sent the first message is no longer concerned about making the instruction look legitimate.”

He paused.

“They are concerned about what happens if I leave.”

CHAPTER 4 — THE CALL FROM A DEAD EXTENSION

Brooks requested that the airport's communications supervisor preserve the notification records and determine how the messages had reached Mitchell's device.

She made the request through the ordinary chain of command, documenting every step. She deliberately avoided replying to the unknown sender or forwarding the suspicious message through any channel she had not verified.

While she waited for a response, Daniel sat quietly beside the desk.

Mitchell remained near the door.

The officer's earlier arrogance had given way to something more complicated. He was embarrassed, certainly. He was also frightened by the possibility that his own department had become a tool for someone else's purposes.

Finally, he spoke.

“Mr. Mercer.”

Daniel looked at him.

“I need to ask you something.”

“Go ahead.”

“If someone was trying to stop you, why would they send the instruction to me? Why not send it to a supervisor?”

News in the same category

THE OFFICER GRABBED HIS SUIT — THEN THE MAN SAID, “YOU’VE MADE A HUGE MISTAKE”

7 Part